Best Corporate Volunteering Software: Compare the Leading Platforms

Choosing the right corporate volunteering software is essential for organizations that want to streamline event management, boost employee participation, and measure their social impact. The best platforms remove administrative friction, simplify volunteer engagement, and provide data-driven insights so CSR teams can focus on strategy rather than logistics.

This guide compares the top volunteering software providers across the industry. These descriptions reflect research from third‑party reviews, vendor information, and direct client feedback to provide a detailed and objective perspective.

1. YourCause from Blackbaud

YourCause from Blackbaud offers a comprehensive volunteering solution as part of a unified platform that also manages employee giving, matching, campaigns, and impact reporting. CSRconnect is built for scale, supporting employees and administrators with mobile-responsive volunteer event creation, approvals, check‑in, and rich reporting tools.

Employees can easily find opportunities by location, skills, cause area, or event type—while admins manage everything from shifts to waivers to automated reminders. With access to over 7 million vetted nonprofits globally and support for 26 languages, YourCause helps organizations run meaningful volunteering programs that resonate across geographies.

Pros:

• Robust volunteer event admin, including shifts, custom questions, waivers, dietary needs, and partner submissions.
• Flexible volunteering formats: team events, personal volunteering, recurring volunteering, and campaign‑driven participation.
• Ability to create employee skills profiles and match with relevant volunteering opportunities for skill-based projects.
• Built-in impact dashboards and data feeds provide clear insight into volunteer hours, participation trends, and campaign success.
• A fully mobile-responsive platform, as well as mobile check‑in via QR code, which simplifies attendance tracking and reduces admin overhead.
• Global coverage with multilingual support and deep nonprofit verification.
• Integrated rewards such as volunteer time off (VTO), Dollars for Doers, volunteer recognition, and impact incentives.
• A nonprofit-friendly platform that makes it easy for charities of all sizes to add events individually or through API connections.

Cons:

• No dedicated mobile app currently; however, an app is in development and will be live in 2026.
• Does not develop custom one‑off features for individual clients, prioritizing scalable best‑practice functionality.

YourCause is ideal for organizations seeking a unified, global, scalable volunteer management system with sophisticated reporting and cross‑program integration.

2. Benevity

Benevity is well known for its employee engagement footprint and offers volunteering alongside giving, micro‑actions, and community investment tools. Its volunteering catalog is large and includes global opportunities.

Pros:

• Strong global volunteering network with personalized dashboards and interest‑based recommendations.
• Automated workflows for sign‑ups, reminders, time tracking, and volunteer rewards.
• Curated catalog of volunteer opportunities aligned to company pillars.

Cons:

• Admin experience can be complex, often requiring support intervention to make routine updates.
• Reporting depth varies and some insights require paid add‑ons.
• Pricing skews toward large enterprises and may exceed the needs/budget of smaller CSR teams.
• Users report slower donation and program processing times and inconsistency across modules.
• Difficult for nonprofits to engage in adding and managing volunteering events.

Best for multinational corporations needing extensive engagement features, though may pose challenges for teams requiring agility and streamlined admin control.

3. Bonterra (CyberGrants)

Bonterra—previously CyberGrants—supports volunteering as part of a broader grants management and community investment suite.

Pros:

• Supports complex multi‑step approval workflows suitable for regulated industries and intricate programming.
• Integrates volunteering with grantmaking and giving for organizations with heavy compliance requirements.

Cons:

• User interface and reporting feel dated, which can create a steep learning curve for admins and employees.
• Global capabilities and volunteer search functionality are limited compared to newer platforms.
• Pricing and implementation are typically geared toward very large enterprise programs.
• Difficult for nonprofits to engage in adding and managing volunteering events.

Best suited for organizations with legacy CSR program complexity who can absorb higher overhead and more rigid workflows.

4. Deed

Deed emphasizes ease of use and a modern interface to encourage participation in both giving and volunteering. Their volunteering functionality focuses on simplicity and employee engagement.

Pros:

• Intuitive UI that employees describe as modern, fun, and engaging.
• Easy event creation and participation for straightforward volunteer programs.
• Transparent view into volunteer hours and impact for both admins and employees.

Cons:

• Reporting and analytics lack depth, making it harder to measure impact across a global workforce.
• Scalability challenges for more complex volunteering needs.
• Limited support for more complex formats such as multi‑shift management or skills‑based matching.

Deed fits smaller programs prioritizing user experience over breadth of functionality.

5. Submittable

Submittable, traditionally a grants platform, has expanded into employee giving and volunteering through acquisitions.

Pros:

• Strong workflow tools and customizable forms for tracking volunteer participation.
• Offers access to curated volunteer experiences through acquired partners.
• Simple UI and responsive support team for setup questions.

Cons:

• Product fragmentation due to acquired systems results in inconsistent user experiences and reporting gaps.
• Slower innovation cycles caused by tech‑debt limits new volunteering capabilities.
• Pricing may escalate for teams requiring multiple modules or additional reviewers.

6. Groundswell

Groundswell is a newer entrant that emphasizes employee-led philanthropy and streamlined giving, with volunteering available but not as mature as other platforms.

Pros:

• Intuitive, consumer‑grade interface encourages participation.
• Responsive support and quick onboarding.
• Simplified management of time tracking and volunteering contributions.

Cons:

• Volunteering features lack depth relative to established platforms; better suited to simple programs.
• Reporting and automation capabilities are limited.
• Higher cost noted by some users, especially given the lean feature set.

Groundswell is best for organizations prioritizing a modern UI over advanced reporting or flexible volunteer administration.

7. Percent Pledge & Goodstack

Percent Pledge and Goodstack are emerging vendors offering lightweight volunteering and giving functionality for teams wanting simplicity.

Pros:

• Affordable and easy to implement with minimal training.
• User-friendly interfaces with curated volunteer options and basic tracking.
• Goodstack provides strong nonprofit verification support; Percent Pledge offers event planning services.

Cons:

• Limited international coverage and fewer nonprofit options.
• Reporting and analytics are basic and may not meet enterprise needs.
• Feature sets are narrow and not designed for complex volunteering programs.

Ideal for very small organizations or those looking to launch basic volunteer offerings for the first time.

8. Millie

Millie focuses on simplicity and affordability with a simple volunteering component in addition to their more built-out giving functionality.

Pros:

• Employees easily find and join volunteer opportunities with a clean interface.
• Strong support for team volunteering, events, drives, and community campaigns.
• Great for building a culture of participation due to ease of use and quick setup.

Cons:

• Reporting depth lags behind enterprise-focused platforms.
• Navigation for fundraising and some program elements can feel complicated.
• Functionality gaps may emerge for global or scale-heavy volunteer programs.

Best for companies seeking an approachable tool for volunteer engagement without heavy administrative needs.